Having come this far in my ordeal, I took a moment to reflect on who has actually been useful in my healing. That led me to a very interesting thought:
I've only worked with a couple of doctors. Otherwise there are many "medical professionals" (who happen to have a MD or equivalent). And some of them are posers too.
These medical posers (MPs) are great at generating billing events. Yet they demonstrate no interest in the duty they're sworn to.
Their P. A.'s and visiting med students are in no position to question their master. That allows free reign for MPs to use the system to their will, doing and saying one thing (in a private room/session), while documenting another entirely different matter conducive to their schemes.
Closed source code has historically functioned in the manner also. A company says their software does one thing, but it's actually doing another while presenting itself within the bonds of its stated design. Then came Open Source code. Transparency revealed the codes' true nature for all to see, to praise or critique.
Our society still deeply harbors the "wounded bird" philosophy, thus when sickness strikes, keeping such information secret is highly prioritized. This facilitates MPs to operate in rouge and scandalous fashions. The sick are left to fight themselves out of vicious cycles that can easily plunge them into worse conditions.
It is in my opinion that a doctor should:
a) Have all patient sessions audio and video recorded, including surgical procedures
b) Grant allowances to give doctors the ability to work outside the box, not just constrain them to strict policy
c) Make this media a national medical database that can be viewed by any doctor, or patient (inclusive to their own media only), AND
d) Allow access as stated above in a library type environment, however all viewing sessions have access logs in addition to video monitoring/recording (to deter/prevent inevitable perverted activities, especially by MP staff)
e) Watch the watchers. The same monitoring of media terminals is enforced on the surveillance team, with a monitor display in plain sight, like security monitors in a retail store openly displaying the security feed to help deter theft.
Meanwhile, paradoxically, written medical records would not be allowed to be shared in any blanket form with any entity. For instance, currently, if you go to Big Med Corp Clinic to see a cardiologist, and that doctor/MP thinks your making it all up (doesn't tell you, only documents their opinion), sends you on your way, and you decide to see a pulmonary doctor for the chest issues you're presenting, that second doctor, without your knowledge, will have read documentation before you've even been seen. Their perspective biased and corrupted, your ability to procure treatment has just become significantly more difficult - BUT NOBODY IS SAYING ANYTHING, just leading you on to believe that they're being attentive and caring.
Their documentation must not contradict the first MP lest they disturb the peering relationship expected within the profession. Only a gross (meaning obviously visible or apparent in medical terms) symptom identified by the second doctor at this point would be grounds to contradict the former. If so, this matter is handled delicately, as to not invoke Liability. Follow the money!
As for my media suggestions above, a proper security team would be needed to guard that database. Zero internet/patient portal connections. Target has formed a pretty good security team now - building such a team could be modeled from their efforts.
